http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm An Eclectic Mix Of Gadgets & Wired Madness Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:55:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/comment-page-1#comment-12883 jim ralles Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:51:10 +0000 http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/#comment-12883 the 100' claim is false. 20-30' is all you get. the 100′ claim is false. 20-30′ is all you get.

]]> http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9276 Askari Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:44:39 +0000 http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/#comment-9276 I'd bet that the socket is drawing less wattage than the TV set does, possibly even over a LCD set and especially so if you still have a CRT set. I’d bet that the socket is drawing less wattage than the TV set does, possibly even over a LCD set and especially so if you still have a CRT set.

]]> http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7766 vincent Fri, 04 May 2007 07:56:00 +0000 http://www.uberreview.com/2007/05/remote-controlled-switch-socket.htm/#comment-7766 The question is whether it really saves energy? instead of the tv being standby to receive signals from the TV remote control, your remote socket is now in standby mode to receive the signal from the remote socket remote. The question is whether it really saves energy? instead of the tv being standby to receive signals from the TV remote control, your remote socket is now in standby mode to receive the signal from the remote socket remote.

]]>