<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 65 Inches of OLED Killer from Mitsubishi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm</link>
	<description>An Eclectic Mix Of Gadgets &#38; Wired Madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:38:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MikeerF</title>
		<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm/comment-page-1#comment-11663</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeerF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm#comment-11663</guid>
		<description>Cost, of course, will be a factor for many consumers.  Which is why rear projection was very popular for so many years despite plasma having a superior picture quality.  And, after all, it is &quot;just&quot; a TV, as I keep being reminded from friends of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost, of course, will be a factor for many consumers.  Which is why rear projection was very popular for so many years despite plasma having a superior picture quality.  And, after all, it is &#8220;just&#8221; a TV, as I keep being reminded from friends of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: primo</title>
		<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm/comment-page-1#comment-11643</link>
		<dc:creator>primo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm#comment-11643</guid>
		<description>Lazer is of course an awesome technology but highly unlikely the worlds major corps who are developing and produce OLED related products will be to worried about lazer tv. OLED has alot going for it and the screen size issue is moot. OLED will reach large screen sizes when the time comes and they will rlease them when the time comes. 

These companies dont spend multi millions / billions on OLED tech development knowing whats out there and worry about having OLED being defunct before its started. 

They both will find their niche as plasma and lcd are today so prevelant.

OLED rules the next wave of tv imho and the news releases , money, development and interets back it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lazer is of course an awesome technology but highly unlikely the worlds major corps who are developing and produce OLED related products will be to worried about lazer tv. OLED has alot going for it and the screen size issue is moot. OLED will reach large screen sizes when the time comes and they will rlease them when the time comes. </p>
<p>These companies dont spend multi millions / billions on OLED tech development knowing whats out there and worry about having OLED being defunct before its started. </p>
<p>They both will find their niche as plasma and lcd are today so prevelant.</p>
<p>OLED rules the next wave of tv imho and the news releases , money, development and interets back it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dobs</title>
		<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm/comment-page-1#comment-11636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm#comment-11636</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this just Laser DLP?

Still doesn&#039;t compete with 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio of todays OLED, which is 100 times better (not just double) the best contrast ratio of plasma&#039;s 10,000:1.

If I was a betting man, I&#039;d have the house on OLED. =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this just Laser DLP?</p>
<p>Still doesn&#8217;t compete with 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio of todays OLED, which is 100 times better (not just double) the best contrast ratio of plasma&#8217;s 10,000:1.</p>
<p>If I was a betting man, I&#8217;d have the house on OLED. =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roc Joco</title>
		<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm/comment-page-1#comment-11613</link>
		<dc:creator>Roc Joco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberreview.com/2008/02/65-inches-of-oled-killer-from-mitsubishi.htm#comment-11613</guid>
		<description>Laser TV has a shot at saving the fledgling rear-projection market, and this will just be the beginning for integrated laser light engines.

http://laser-tv.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laser TV has a shot at saving the fledgling rear-projection market, and this will just be the beginning for integrated laser light engines.</p>
<p><a href="http://laser-tv.org" rel="nofollow">http://laser-tv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
