<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Energy Technology Breakthrough Makes a More Viable Energy Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uberreview.com/2008/08/solar-energy-technology-breakthrough-makes-a-more-viable-energy-source.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/08/solar-energy-technology-breakthrough-makes-a-more-viable-energy-source.htm</link>
	<description>An Eclectic Mix Of Gadgets &#38; Wired Madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:15:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Templeman</title>
		<link>http://www.uberreview.com/2008/08/solar-energy-technology-breakthrough-makes-a-more-viable-energy-source.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13882</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Templeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberreview.com/?p=7472#comment-13882</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me why hydrogen is one of the most plentiful gases in the universe?
It’s because nothing in nature contains it for very long. Hydrogen atoms are so small they bounce (collide) off of other particles and eventually they will emerge on the other side of almost any barrier. Steel cannot hold Hydrogen, there are a few man made products, and I think one of them is called Barium or something like that.
These man made items take large amounts of resources and energy to produce, causing us to use even move of our planets natural resources. The splitting of the Hydrogen gas into two items also takes a lot of energy, especially on the scale we are talking about. Once split for shipping and handling purposes, you basically are handling two separate bombs far more explosive than any petroleum based product. Once the two gases arrive at there destination they must be recombined. I have no idea on the amount of energy this would take. It seems to me that we will be using 3 to 4 times the amount of fossil fuel (pollution) to produce this new form of clean and environmentally safe energy. Also all transportation will still be tethered to the pump.
The fuel cell is a good idea as a backup power source not the main power source!

I wonder which large corporations are at the leading edge of fuel cell research; also which large corporations own them, Exxon, Mobile…  

I don’t know anything about photovoltaic cells (solar Power) except I would not be tethered to a corporate owned refueling station, except when traveling or on a cloudy day or at night…(Problems to overcome). With a solar cell on the roof a battery in the garage, recharging your vehicle is just as easy as recharging your cell phone utilizing  blue tooth wireless technology. It seams to me a free energy source is a far more logical choice. I know solar power has its own set of problems, but sunlight is plentiful and free all around the globe.

Question: Dose the planet or the life on it need Hydrogen. Will there be any affect to the planets water if we remove that much hydrogen from it. Could we be trading one crisis (Global warming) for another one farther down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me why hydrogen is one of the most plentiful gases in the universe?<br />
It’s because nothing in nature contains it for very long. Hydrogen atoms are so small they bounce (collide) off of other particles and eventually they will emerge on the other side of almost any barrier. Steel cannot hold Hydrogen, there are a few man made products, and I think one of them is called Barium or something like that.<br />
These man made items take large amounts of resources and energy to produce, causing us to use even move of our planets natural resources. The splitting of the Hydrogen gas into two items also takes a lot of energy, especially on the scale we are talking about. Once split for shipping and handling purposes, you basically are handling two separate bombs far more explosive than any petroleum based product. Once the two gases arrive at there destination they must be recombined. I have no idea on the amount of energy this would take. It seems to me that we will be using 3 to 4 times the amount of fossil fuel (pollution) to produce this new form of clean and environmentally safe energy. Also all transportation will still be tethered to the pump.<br />
The fuel cell is a good idea as a backup power source not the main power source!</p>
<p>I wonder which large corporations are at the leading edge of fuel cell research; also which large corporations own them, Exxon, Mobile…  </p>
<p>I don’t know anything about photovoltaic cells (solar Power) except I would not be tethered to a corporate owned refueling station, except when traveling or on a cloudy day or at night…(Problems to overcome). With a solar cell on the roof a battery in the garage, recharging your vehicle is just as easy as recharging your cell phone utilizing  blue tooth wireless technology. It seams to me a free energy source is a far more logical choice. I know solar power has its own set of problems, but sunlight is plentiful and free all around the globe.</p>
<p>Question: Dose the planet or the life on it need Hydrogen. Will there be any affect to the planets water if we remove that much hydrogen from it. Could we be trading one crisis (Global warming) for another one farther down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
